Perfectionism and Coping with Injury in Marathon Runners: A Test of the 2×2 Model of Perfectionism

Perfectionism dimensions have previously demonstrated different relationships with coping strategies in sport. The purpose of the present study was to extend existing research by examining the interactive effects of perfectionism dimensions on strategies employed by marathon runners to cope with injury. This involved testing the hypotheses of the 2×2 model of perfectionism in marathon runners. Marathon runners (n = 224, female n = 81, M age = 39.77 years, SD = 9.50 years) completed measures capturing four sub-types of perfectionism (pure personal standards perfectionism, pure evaluative concerns perfectionism, mixed perfectionism, and non-perfectionism) and strategies for coping with injury (problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, and avoidance coping). Moderated regression analyses provided support for all four hypotheses of the 2×2 model for problem-focused coping, one hypothesis for emotion-focused coping, and one hypothesis for avoidance coping. The findings suggest that problem-focused coping is higher for pure personal standards perfectionism compared to the three other sub-types of perfectionism, emotion-focused coping is higher for pure personal standards perfectionism compared to non-perfectionism, and avoidance coping is similar across all sub-types of perfectionism. The results provide an initial indication of the potential of the 2×2 model of perfectionism to explain differences in the use of coping strategies in context of marathon running injury.