Abstract
The canon is widely recognised in drama school training contexts as the dramatic and practitioner texts with which actors can expect to work. The canon studied is often proscriptively - and therefore prohibitively - narrow. These two observations lead to the questioning of who, and for what industry, training actors are being prepared. Articulation of the Western bias and shortcomings of the hegemonic canon is well versed, but alternatives are often predicated on augmentation via addition. Examining and understanding the conceit by which canonical status is ascribed, achieved, and maintained, holds the answer to how the canon can be challenged and changed to allow for culture to evolve, through the plurality of stories and not regurgitation and perpetuation of those already lauded.
More Information
Divisions: | Leeds School of the Arts |
---|---|
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/19443927.2023.2182830 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis Group |
Additional Information: | © 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1904 Performing Arts and Creative Writing, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Daly, Dermot |
Date Deposited: | 17 Nov 2023 12:19 |
Last Modified: | 02 Nov 2024 05:04 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial
| Preview