Abstract
Since becoming Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak has been variously described as pursuing a ‘furtive’, ‘surreptitious’ and ‘apologetic’ industrial strategy. Terms such as industrial policy and industrial strategy have been expunged from official speeches and policy documents, yet industrial intervention remains widespread. In adopting this approach, the article argues that Sunak has returned the UK to an industrial policy consensus established under Thatcherism. This consensus places in the foreground pro‐market rhetoric and policies suggesting that industrial strategy should be limited to the correction of market failure, while in the background the state actively intervenes to shape the structure of the economy by ‘picking winners’. In following this approach, Sunak has a legitimate claim to be the heir to Thatcher's legacy, although not in the manner that either its celebrants or critics believe.
More Information
Divisions: | School of Humanities and Social Sciences |
---|---|
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13406 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Additional Information: | © 2024 The Author(s). |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1605 Policy and Administration; 1606 Political Science; Political Science & Public Administration; 4407 Policy and administration; 4408 Political science |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Silverwood, James |
Date Deposited: | 05 Jul 2024 09:56 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2024 06:57 |
Item Type: | Article |
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):