Abstract
In this review essay, I explore the first two of a planned 10 volumes of Ben Fine’s selected journal publications. The two are broadly concerned with economics imperialism before and after a ‘watershed’ (before which it is recognised for what it is and after which it is less so). I first set out what Fine means by economics imperialism. I then discuss a few examples of what heterodox economists have been talking about insofar as they were not (quite) talking about economics imperialism. This provides a useful segue into the specifics of Fine’s writings across the two volumes, and in two subsections, I separately survey the volumes. Finally, I conclude with some comment on the sense of unfinished business that hangs over constructive change.
Official URL
More Information
Divisions: | Leeds Business School |
---|---|
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzae012 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press (OUP) |
Additional Information: | This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Contributions to Political Economy following peer review. The version of record Morgan, J. (2024). Economics Imperialism then and now: Ben Fine on the Changing Relationship between Economics and the Other Social Sciences. Contributions to Political Economy is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzae012 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1401 Economic Theory; 1402 Applied Economics; Economics; 3502 Banking, finance and investment; 3801 Applied economics |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Morgan, Jamie |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jun 2024 16:00 |
Last Modified: | 15 Jul 2024 23:16 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download. For more information please email openaccess@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.