Abstract
This paper critically examines how future thinking is positioned in the mindset of event professionals through the lens of provocative far future scenarios. In debating these far future scenarios within a polylogue (multiple voices) framework, we explore how dianoetic (discursive reasoning) approaches can facilitate long-term ´civilisational´ thinking and capture stakeholder reactions and emotions to future event environments.
As such, our study contributes comparative qualitative insights into how current and future industry professionals respond to the contradictions and complexities of event futures. Our findings have implications for industry resilience and strategic thinking at a time when Covid-19 pandemic recovery has coincided with other global economic challenges and unpredictable threats such as climate change.
Our findings highlight the importance of developing effective tools to overcome emotional barriers to thinking about the future. They also reveal the importance of engaging a broad stakeholder demographic and learning from other sectors to diversify conversations about the future.
More Information
Divisions: | Carnegie School of Sport |
---|---|
Status: | In Press |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Ingenta Connect |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Wood, Emma |
Date Deposited: | 26 Jun 2024 13:38 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2024 02:01 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download. For more information please email openaccess@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):