Abstract
Distraction Burglary and Rogue Trader fraud are crimes involving the systematic and disproportionate repeat victimisation of older people on their ‘doorstep’ and inside their homes. This chapter delineates the distinctions and overlaps between such ‘artifice’ crimes. Under reporting and under recording of these incidents as ‘crimes’ is prevalent in which some officers breach National Crime Recording Standards (NCRS). Narrative scripts include promoting the perception these crimes are “civil disputes”, as well as suggesting perpetrators are bona fide ‘legitimate’ tradespersons. The competency of the victim is also questioned where seemingly ‘confused’ burglary victims “consent” to perpetrators entering their home. Another iterative theme is of no property being stolen, which is often combined with an assertion that no offender(s) entered the property, thereby negating the ‘trespass’. Such scripts are utilised by officers to deconstruct and decriminalise the crime event, thereby justifying a ‘no crime’ decision and no requirement for further investigation.
Although rogue trader is equally traumatic for victims, as well as more financially lucrative for perpetrators, fraud is treated as a lesser crime and deemed a low policing priority; which is a surprise given that fraud constitutes 41% of all recorded crime in England and Wales (House of Commons, 2023).
More Information
Divisions: | Leeds Law School |
---|---|
Status: | In Press |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Palgrave Macmillan |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Policing Doorstep Crime; Distraction Burglary; Rogue Trader; repeat victimisation; older people. |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Aplin, Rachael |
Date Deposited: | 02 Sep 2024 09:29 |
Last Modified: | 02 Sep 2024 13:31 |
Item Type: | Book Section |
Download
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download. For more information please email openaccess@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.