Abstract
Online travel agencies commonly utilize 5-point and 10 point scales to display hotel ratings. When processing and comparing hotel ratings on different numerical scales (e.g., 4.1/5 vs. 8.4/10), what method(s) do consumers use? Through nine studies, this research shows that consumers tend to employ absolute differences (e.g., 5-4.1 vs. 10- 8.4) or relative differences (e.g., 4.1÷5 vs. 8.4÷10) when making comparative judgments. Notably, the choice of method can lead to preference reversals. We further reveal that higher numeracy leads to greater reliance on relative differences. However, such an impact is attenuated under a utilitarian motive. Additionally, a greater promotion focus leads to greater reliance on absolute differences. The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how consumers process hotel ratings.
More Information
Divisions: | Carnegie School of Sport |
---|---|
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103822 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Elsevier Masson |
Additional Information: | © 2024 Elsevier Ltd |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1504 Commercial Services; 1505 Marketing; 1506 Tourism; Sport, Leisure & Tourism; 3506 Marketing; 3508 Tourism; 4406 Human geography |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Ye, Tian |
Date Deposited: | 17 Sep 2024 14:08 |
Last Modified: | 17 Sep 2024 17:55 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download. For more information please email openaccess@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):
- B Yang
- T Ye ORCID: 0000-0001-8478-6837
- S Liu
- Y Zhao