Abstract
The article is a lightly edited transcript of a digital roundtable discussion. The participants were invited based on their prior work on critical realism and epistemology. The roundtable discussion includes introductory statements on judgemental rationality by Jamie Morgan, Ruth Groff, Dorothea Schoppek, Leigh Price, and Frédéric Vandenberghe, followed by a discussion between the participants on a variety of topics related to judgemental rationality. The discussion demonstrates a variety of opinions and perspectives, as well as the clashing of opinions in a respectful manner. The roundtable provides interesting discussion points about Bhaskar's approach to judgemental rationality, how we adjudicate between different meta-theories (such as between that of Bhaskar and Harré), and what role should normative values have in theoretical adjudication.
Official URL
More Information
Divisions: | Leeds Business School |
---|---|
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2024.2435090 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Informa UK Limited |
Additional Information: | © 2024 The Author(s) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1606 Political Science; 2203 Philosophy; 5003 Philosophy |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Mann, Elizabeth |
Date Deposited: | 31 Jan 2025 15:19 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jan 2025 15:19 |
Item Type: | Article |
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):