Abstract
Evaluating the performance of domestic retrofits is essential in appraising their success and identifying if they improved the lives of occupants. In the UK, billions of pounds are invested annually in retrofits through policy funding, however, current building regulations do not mandate evaluation, and monitoring requirements are poorly defined. Without agreed standardised protocols or tools, retrofit evaluations remain inconsistent and incomparable, providing little assurance to occupants, landlords, installers, or the government. Post-occupancy evaluation (POE) is a common and well-established form of building performance evaluation (BPE) used in retrofit evaluations; however, it faces challenges in multi-dwelling retrofit schemes.
This research evaluated the effectiveness of occupancy evaluation surveys in five domestic retrofit projects overseen by a local authority in Northern England between 2022 and 2024. Phase one implemented a retrofit survey taken from the UKGBCs BuildUpon2 Framework. In phases two and three, iterative improvements were made to the survey based on feedback from occupants and surveyors from the previous phases. Five key barriers were identified: resources, technical challenges, surveyor engagement, trust, and accessibility. Addressing these challenges increased the survey response rate from 25% to 98%. The refinements significantly improved the quality and usefulness of the data collected, offering valuable insights for designing robust, easily implementable occupant surveys.
More Information
Divisions: | School of Built Environment, Engineering and Computing |
---|---|
Status: | In Press |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis Group |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1201 Architecture; 1202 Building; Building & Construction; 3301 Architecture; 3302 Building; 4005 Civil engineering |
SWORD Depositor: | Symplectic |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Fletcher, Martin |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jul 2025 15:02 |
Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2025 13:47 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download

Due to copyright restrictions, this file is not available for public download. For more information please email openaccess@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):