Abstract
Background: Increasingly the health impacts of physical inactivity are being distinguished from those of sedentary behaviour. Nevertheless, deleterious health prognoses occur when these behaviours combine, making it a Public Health priority to establish the numbers and salient identifying factors of people who live with this injurious combination. Method: Using an observational between-subjects design, a non-probability sample of 22,836 participants provided data on total daily activity. A 2-step hierarchical cluster analysis identified the optimal number of clusters and the subset of distinguishing variables. Univariate analyses assessed significant cluster differences. Results: High levels of sitting clustered with low physical activity. The ‘Ambulatory & Active’ cluster (n=6,254) sat for 2.5 to 5 h d-1 and were highly active. They were significantly younger, included a greater proportion of males and reported low Indices of Multiple Deprivation compared to other clusters. Conversely, the ‘Sedentary & Low Active’ cluster (n=6,286) achieved ≤60 MET.min.wk-1 of physical activity and sat for ≥8 h d-1. They were the oldest cluster, housed the largest proportion of females and reported moderate Indices of Multiple Deprivation. Conclusions: Public Health systems may benefit from developing policy and interventions that do more to limit sedentary behaviour and encourage light intensity activity in its place.
Official URL
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2015-0307 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Human Kinetics |
Date Deposited: | 14 Mar 2016 14:24 |
Last Modified: | 14 Jul 2024 04:09 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes. (Converted to PDF)
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):