Abstract
This paper describes an intervention aimed at reducing the occurrence of common weaknesses in first level work and thereby improving student performance in assessments. The project involved developing a more systematic approach to embedding information literacy (I.L.) into the first year curriculum in the Carnegie Faculty at Leeds Beckett University by combining the expertise of Subject Librarians with that of First Year tutors. It was part of a broader programme of institutional curricular change. This collaborative approach was informed by data from individual interviews with previous students and based on a dual rationale: firstly from Sadler’s (2002) call for more high impact, low stakes assessment in the first year and secondly a need to avoid creating a culture of ‘testing’ (Sambell, et al. 2013) in which students position themselves as submitting to others’ judgments rather than developing rational autonomy (Baxter-Magolda, 2003). In other words, we needed to design an assessed activity which encouraged students to engage in learning but created a supportive and collaborative approach. The embedding process together with some of the resources and tools which we developed are described in this paper as well as the respective contributions of the various participants. We explore the impact of two years of implementation based on student interviews and tutor evaluations. Recommendations and examples are provided to demonstrate how a similar approach might work elsewhere either as a local, course specific intervention or as part of an institution-wide approach to improving students’ digital literacy. Keywords: information literacy: digital literacy: first year: intervention: embedded.
Official URL
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v4i2.204 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Date Deposited: | 21 Mar 2016 15:47 |
Last Modified: | 13 Jul 2024 08:00 |
Item Type: | Article |