Abstract
In two experiments we investigated factors that undermine conclusions about implicit motor learning in the continuous tracking paradigm. In Experiment 1, we constructed a practice phase in which all three segments of the waveform pattern were random, in order to examine whether tracking performance decreased as a consequence of time spent on task. Tracking error was lower in the first segment than in the middle segment and lower in the middle segment than in the final segment, indicating that tracking performance decreased as a function of increasing time-on-task. In Experiment 2, the waveform pattern presented in the middle segment was identical in each trial of practice. In a retention test, tracking performance on the repeated segment was superior to tracking performance on the random segments of the waveform. Furthermore, substitution of the repeated pattern with a random pattern (in a transfer test) resulted in a significantly increased tracking error. These findings imply that characteristics of the repeated pattern were learned. Crucially, tests of pattern recognition implied that participants were not explicitly aware of the presence of a recurring segment of waveform. Recommendations for refining the continuous tracking paradigm for implicit learning research are proposed.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000239 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Humans; Analysis of Variance; Feasibility Studies; Learning; Recognition (Psychology); Retention (Psychology); Transfer (Psychology); Attention; Female; Male; Young Adult; Healthy Volunteers |
Date Deposited: | 21 Mar 2016 10:00 |
Last Modified: | 14 Jul 2024 06:02 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):