Abstract
© 2016 Taylor & Francis. The paper argues that powerful regional knowledge is necessary and possible and that there are historical precedents supporting these claims. Regional knowledge is being used in a double sense: the first Bernsteinian, the second in relation to knowledge generated outside the academy. Both are important if the debate is not to be confined solely to the global north and if the curriculum is to be responsive to geo-political realities. In order to think critically about access to higher education, we need to consider the sorts of knowledge, engagement, and opportunities that are open to newer actors. This includes recognising the contextual nature of professional practice and also that social movements beyond the academy can and do challenge academic knowledge. The paper concludes that many of issues addressed are not capable of theoretical resolution alone and that we need more empirical work to inform curriculum change and renewal.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1157064 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Additional Information: | his is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Teaching in Higher Education on 9 March 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13562517.2016.1157064 |
Date Deposited: | 29 Apr 2016 15:20 |
Last Modified: | 14 Jul 2024 14:57 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview