Abstract
Abstract. The article will briefly and critically review philosophical views on integrity, focusing on integration, identity, standing up for moral principles and ethical decision making practice. It will explore integrity as Aristotle’s virtue of truthfulness, noting how this leads to engagement with the self and the social network. This demands the practice of responsibility, involving: critical agency (developing authorship of the ethical narrative), accountability (involving plural and mutual dialogue), and creative (positive) responsibility (involving both narrative and dialogue around action) In light of this dynamic and social view of integrity the second part the article explores counterfeit integrity. It distinguishes counterfeit integrity based in unexamined ideology and identity from counterfeit integrity based in intentional deception of others about beliefs, values and motives. Each of these are illustrated by figures from Shakespeare’s Henriad, and parallel cases in business and sport.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.68 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Palgrave Macmillan |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Robinson, Simon |
Date Deposited: | 05 Sep 2016 09:22 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2024 19:31 |
Item Type: | Article |