Abstract
RATIONALE: Men have poorer health status and are less likely to attend health screening compared to women. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review presents current evidence on the barriers and facilitators to engaging men in health screening. METHODS: We included qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method studies identified through five electronic databases, contact with experts and reference mining. Two researchers selected and appraised the studies independently. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted using the 'best fit' framework synthesis method. RESULTS: 53 qualitative, 44 quantitative and 6 mixed-method studies were included. Factors influencing health screening uptake in men can be categorized into five domains: individual, social, health system, healthcare professional and screening procedure. The most commonly reported barriers are fear of getting the disease and low risk perception; for facilitators, they are perceived risk and benefits of screening. Male-dominant barriers include heterosexual -self-presentation, avoidance of femininity and lack of time. The partner's role is the most common male-dominant facilitator to screening. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of barriers and facilitators to health screening in men including the male-dominant factors. The findings are particularly useful for clinicians, researchers and policy makers who are developing interventions and policies to increase screening uptake in men.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.023 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Barrier, Facilitator, Masculinity, Men's health, Qualitative, Quantitative, Screening, Systematic review, Public Health, 1117 Public Health And Health Services, 1601 Anthropology, 1608 Sociology, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Sheppard, Nick on behalf of White, Alan |
Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2016 14:52 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2024 21:14 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):
- CH Teo
- CJ Ng
- A Booth
- A White ORCID: 0000-0001-8054-7783