Abstract
The recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Hutchinson v United Kingdom (2015) is the latest twist in the political legal struggle between Westminster and Strasbourg. Whilst the British government has made several successions to the ECtHR regarding the role of the executive in the imprisonment of lifers, the thorny issue of the whole of life tariff, and prospect of prisoner release under that tariff, has been an ongoing debate. Whilst the ECtHR appeared to directly challenge domestic policy in the preceding decision in Vinter and Others v United Kingdom this latest decision, the seeming retreat from Vinter, by the Fourth Section of the court, appears to be more of a response to hard line domestic politics than a continuation of holistic legal principle which the ECtHR has outwardly supported in the past.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-23032072 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Martinus Nijhoff Publishers |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1602 Criminology, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Pettigrew, Mark |
Date Deposited: | 15 Nov 2017 08:47 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jul 2024 21:08 |
Item Type: | Article |