Abstract
Mentoring is widely acknowledged to be an important contributor to women’s career success and progression but women often struggle to access mentoring networks that can help sponsor and develop their careers. Formal mentoring programmes designed specifically for women help overcome this challenge, but such schemes may at the same time reinforce masculine discourses which position women as deficient in relation to the invisibly male norm that is implicit within contemporary working practices. Drawing on a formal women-only mentoring programme built on gender-positive goals to empower women to ‘be the best they can be’ within the events industry, this paper considers the extent to which such programmes can both challenge and reproduce gendered discourses of business and success. Interviews with mentors and mentees illustrate how such programmes make gender visible within business and individual careers, but masculinist underpinnings of organisational discourses remain invisible, unacknowledged and thus largely unchallenged.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12262 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Additional Information: | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Dashper, K. Challenging the gendered rhetoric of success? The limitations of women‐only mentoring for tackling gender inequality in the workplace. Gender Work Organ. 2019; 26: 541– 557, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12262. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1503 Business And Management, 1699 Other Studies In Human Society, Gender Studies, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Dashper, Kate |
Date Deposited: | 19 Mar 2018 10:52 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2024 03:57 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview