Abstract
Rock climbing is an increasingly popular physical activity with indoor competition climbing accepted for inclusion at the summer 2020 Olympic Games in Tokyo. The International Olympic Committee consensus statement recommends the accurate monitoring of training load to reduce injury risk in athletes (Soligard, et al., 2016). Differences in acute/chronic training loads have been found to be predictive of injury occurrence (Gabbett, 2016). In published climbing literature to date, differences in injury terminology, data collection procedures, calculation of exposure and operational measures of performance used by authorship teams impedes comparison. At present, there is no consensus on design characteristics for use in epidemiological cohort studies in rock climbing. The aim of this article is to report a critical appraisal of methodologies used to estimate load and recommends an amendment to the IRCRA comparative grading scale to include British adjectival grade and design characteristics for future studies.
More Information
Status: | Unpublished |
---|---|
Refereed: | Yes |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Jones, Gareth |
Date Deposited: | 07 Aug 2018 08:56 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jul 2024 07:31 |
Event Title: | 4th Congress International Rock Climbing Research Association |
Event Dates: | 08 July 2018 - 14 July 2018 |
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):