Abstract
This article examines the clash between John Smith and Edward Maria Wingfield as an emblematic example of wider social frictions between a rising yeomanry and a declining gentry, setting the conflict in a discursive context that combined approval and condemnation of the thrifty yeoman with a traditional denigration of commerce. The article shows how Smith rose to prominence in the Virginia colony by deploying bargaining skills acquired as the eldest son of an enterprising yeoman farmer. In Smith’s hands, private bargaining becomes a practice and a discourse of legitimation, a means of overcoming his subordinate position in the social hierarchy. In the Virginia colony, trade, money and markets – a system of abstract equivalences – cause social distinctions to melt.
More Information
Status: | Published |
---|---|
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | The Virginia Historical Society |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 2103 Historical Studies, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Lawson, Andrew |
Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2018 11:09 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jul 2024 16:30 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview