Abstract
The ways in which Anorexia Nervosa (AN) has been described and explained has differed drastically over time although since it was first named in 1874 it has been primarily associated with women and girls it is argued in this paper that it came to be more fundamentally associated with femininity due to certain disciplinary changes in the psy sciences. The influential psychiatrist Hilde Bruch lamented the loss in clarity of the clinical picture that was the result of psychoanalytic interpretations, to remedy this she reformulated AN into a pathology that was the result of the individual being too determined by external influences. Bruch’s changes increased the emphasis that psychiatrists placed on the relationship between women and their social context and the lack of individual autonomy that many felt. Feminist writers adapted Bruch’s theory to suggest that patriarchal culture was colonizing the lives of women and that social rather than individual change needed to occur. Psychiatrists subsequently developed scales for assessing gender identity which switched the emphasis back onto individuals and rendered gender as an individualised, quantifiable, manipulable object. When reified and individualised in this fashion it became more legitimate to discuss femininity as causative of, and masculinity as a protection against, AN.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2011.20.4.437 |
---|---|
Refereed: | Yes |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | anorexia nervosa, gender, psychiatry, objectification, gender identity scales, masculinity |
Date Deposited: | 10 Oct 2014 11:38 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2024 19:33 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
Note: this is the author's updated manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes. (PDF)
| Preview