Abstract
Events Management is a relatively new subject within universities, and is positioned as a vocational field with links to industry and practice. This paper considers the role of the academic within Events Management higher education, and how individuals within this field position themselves and make claims to legitimacy. Drawing on interviews with 16 Events Management academics in the UK, we identify three narrative strategies adopted by individuals in this field as they position themselves in relation to academic and professional identities. The three narrative strategies identified – the anti-academic, the traditional academic and the blended professional – illustrate the precarious and often unstable identities of those within vocational subjects. Individuals within Events Management experience difficulty in terms of both their professional and academic identities, and may rely on a mixture of both traditional (e.g. research and teaching) and industry metrics in their claims to status and legitimacy.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.100201 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1506 Tourism, 1302 Curriculum And Pedagogy, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Dashper, Kate |
Date Deposited: | 03 Jun 2019 07:56 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jul 2024 11:00 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):
- K Dashper ORCID: 0000-0002-2415-2290
- TE Fletcher ORCID: 0000-0002-4618-5480