Lowe, D
(2017)
Prevent Strategies: The Problems Associated in Defining Extremism: The Case of the United Kingdom.
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism.
ISSN 1057-610X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2016.1253941
Abstract
As the United Kingdom has placed some of its Prevent strategy on a statutory footing and is proposing to introduce a Counter-Extremism Bill, this article argues that a legal definition of extremism must be carefully drafted to provide legal certainty. The main recommendation is that all forms of violent and nonviolent extremism comes under the definition, ensuring it is differentiated from activism. Activism may hold radical views counter to the mainstream opinion, but it is required in liberal democracies as it encourages healthy debate and can prevent the policing of thought in any government strategy or legislation.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2016.1253941 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Strategic, Defence & Security Studies, 1606 Political Science, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Brett, Anna on behalf of Lowe, David |
Date Deposited: | 02 Sep 2019 14:59 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2024 18:31 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Accepted Version
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview