Abstract
Public support for Green Belt in England is legendary but is often dismissed as sentimental attachment. The aim of this paper is to situate public support for Green Belt within a history of common rights and access campaigns and a specific cultural landscape of outdoor recreation. This paper contends that Green Belt in England carries notions of common rights established in struggles against the enclosure and privatisation of open spaces from the early nineteenth century and predicated on an understanding that the policy conveys a communal interest in land and landscape. It argues that contemporary public affection for Green Belts is expressed through practices of ‘commoning’ or the performance of claimed common rights of property. Drawing on field research with a popular campaign in North West England, the paper evidences the deployment of a history of access struggles to preserve Green Belt as recreational amenity and accessible countryside. In the perception of Green Belt as a collective resource the paper posits the continuing relevance of common rights to planning policy. It concludes that a clearer understanding of popular support for Green Belt may provide planning scholarship with new perspectives on notions of public good and the use rights of property.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1670049 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Informa UK Limited |
Additional Information: | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning on 24th September 2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1670049. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 0502 Environmental Science and Management, 1205 Urban and Regional Planning, 1605 Policy and Administration, Urban & Regional Planning, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Bradley, Quintin |
Date Deposited: | 27 Sep 2019 11:18 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2024 02:54 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview