Abstract
Practitioners in sport and exercise psychology tasked with service provision in any environment can decide which framework(s) they draw on to inform their applied work. However, the similarities and differences between psychotherapeutic approaches are underrepresented in current literature. Therefore, this paper brings together practitioners from 4 dominant psychotherapeutic approaches to address a specific hypothetical case. Four different cognitive-behavioral approaches are outlined: rational emotive behavior therapy, cognitive therapy, schema therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy. Each practitioner outlines the particular approach and proceeds to address the case by covering assessment, intervention, and evaluation strategies that are specific to it. Similarities and differences across the approaches are discussed, and implications for practice are put forth. Finally, two other practitioners introduce motivational interviewing as an additional framework to foster the working alliance.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2019-0079 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Additional Information: | Accepted author manuscript version reprinted, by permission, from The Sport Psychologist, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2019-0079. © Human Kinetics, Inc. |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Didymus, Faye |
Date Deposited: | 14 Oct 2019 13:10 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2024 07:34 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):