Abstract
This article discusses the merits and challenges of qualitative-interpretive research into violent conflict, which gives local research associates a central, fairly independent role at the data-generating stage. Specifically, we reflect on our collaboration with three Burmese research associates in organising and implementing two arts-based workshops with participants from violence-affected communities in Myanmar’s Kachin and Rakhine states. Against the context of research in a controlling semi-authoritarian state, we focus on how structures and multi-directional flows of power and dynamics of trust/mistrust shaped the way in which the workshops unfolded, which in turn co-determined what kind of textual and visual data was gathered. We conclude that re-search in ‘mixed teams’ of Global North researchers and Global South research associates is able to overcome some of the limitations of conflict research by cultural outsiders such as trust-building with research participants and language and cultural under-standing, but that especially in short-term projects these merits may come at the price of ‘losing control’ over the quality and type of research data, with both positive and negative effects.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2020.1755161 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1606 Political Science, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Julian, Rachel |
Date Deposited: | 05 May 2020 12:03 |
Last Modified: | 04 Aug 2024 07:57 |
Item Type: | Article |
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):