Abstract
Purpose: Antecedents and influences of workplace incivility have recently been studied in many areas of research but there is still lack of consideration for the impact of culture. Theoretical considerations for the present research are based on the cultural dimensions of power distance and tightness/looseness because the collective levels of power distance are similar between Korea and Spain, but the collective levels of tightness/looseness are different between the two countries. The present research examined whether individuals’ occupational position affects their normative reactions to incivility differently. Design/methodology/approach: Participant (victim)’s (those who react to uncivil behaviors) social power (low vs. high) and perpetrator’s (those who exhibit uncivil behaviors) social power (low vs. high) were experimentally manipulated; all participants were randomly assigned to one of four perpetrator x victim conditions in relation to hierarchical positions (Ntot = 467). Findings: The results suggest that the level of social and personal acceptability was greater either among Koreans than Spanish at a collective level or among people who endorsed higher power distance and tightness values. All in all, the findings highlight cultural influences on the importance of social hierarchy as a factor that can impact the people’s normative reactions to incivility. Originality/value: The findings broaden our understanding of psychology of employees in relation to incivility, by simultaneously considering the influences of culture (power distance and tightness/looseness) and social power.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-05-2020-0096 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Emerald |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1503 Business and Management, 1701 Psychology, 1801 Law, Strategic, Defence & Security Studies, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Moon, Chanki |
Date Deposited: | 28 Sep 2020 13:13 |
Last Modified: | 16 Jul 2024 21:26 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):