Abstract
Strategies of localism have constituted the community as a metaphor for democracy and empowerment as part of a wider reordering of state institutions and state power. In conflating the smallest scale with increased participation, however, community localism provides a framework through which the power of sociospatial positioning might be made vulnerable to resistance and change. This paper identifies four spatial practices through which marginalised communities apply the technology of localism to challenge the limitations of their positioning and imprint promises of empowerment and democracy on space. Drawing on the work of Judith Butler, the paper theorises these practices as the incursion into the public realm of regulatory norms related to domestic and private spaces, rendering political space familiar and malleable, and suggesting that power and decision making can be brought within reach. It is argued that these spatial practices of community rehearse a more fundamental transformation of the political ordering of space than that authorised by the state strategies of localism. © 2014 Pion and its Licensors.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1068/d17312 |
---|---|
Refereed: | Yes |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Environmental Science And Management, Urban And Regional Planning, Human Geography, Geography, community, localism, participation, performativity, place, scale |
Date Deposited: | 14 Oct 2014 11:24 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2024 21:43 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview