Abstract
The purpose of this study was to quantify the technical characteristics of U14 and U16 elite youth female soccer match-play and compare position-specific differences between and within these age groups. A total of 449 match observations from 45 matches were undertaken on 189 players representing Regional Talent Centres in The Football Association’s Girls’ England Talent Pathway league. Linear mixed modelling determined position-specific differences for 24 technical and 4 possession-based variables. Results showed similar team possession-based characteristics at both age groups. Interceptions (U14 = 4.6 ± 0.3, U16 = 3.9 ± 0.3) and tackles (U14 = 4.2 ± 0.3, U16 = 3.2 ± 0.3) were the most common defensive actions. Passes were the most common offensive action (U14 = 21.8 ± 1.8, U16 = 25.1 ± 1.9). In possession, U14 central players performed more actions than wide players, whilst actions were more evenly distributed amongst positions at U16, suggesting a variation in playing style between age groups. Technical performances of players were position-dependent, and differences in offensive and defensive variables were observed between age groups across all positions. These findings may assist practitioners in informing specific coaching practice, training programme design or talent identification processes within this population.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2020.1820173 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Informa UK Limited |
Additional Information: | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport on 21st September 2020, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/24748668.2020.1820173 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Emmonds, Stacey |
Date Deposited: | 02 Nov 2020 13:03 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jul 2024 11:33 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):