Abstract
This essay investigates the textual traces of a split that was central to the Victorian conception of manliness: the contradiction of gentlemanliness which demanded both the capacity to commit violence and the requirement to be ‘civilized’. It suggests that there is a fault line running through the fabric of masculinity which can be seen in the texts which train boys to become men, which remember and reconstruct that training and which consider manliness in its mature forms. A man is a subject who acts; he is also subjected to forces which he does not control. In fiction, long and short, and in poetry, masculinity is repeatedly shown to be both contested and constructed – a man-made fibre, not a natural or god-given status. From Tennyson to Wilde, there is a tear in the cloth. Keywords: Victorian manliness and masculinity; gentlemanliness; Alfred Tennyson; Charles Dickens; Rudyard Kipling; Saki (H. H. Munro); Oscar Wilde; Robert Louis Stevenson.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.3366/vic.2014.0167 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Edinburgh University Press |
Additional Information: | Please note this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes |
Date Deposited: | 14 Oct 2014 11:36 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2024 20:35 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview