Abstract
On 9 June 1902, a fire at the General Electric Company offices in Queen Victoria Street led to the deaths of ten employees, including nine young women aged between 14 and 18. A coroner’s inquest was immediately organized to ascertain the cause of death and a number of witnesses were called to give evidence. This article explores the evidence gathered at the inquest, focusing on the testimony of four witnesses: the spectator, employee, survivor and fireman. Their testimony exposed defects in the company’s attitude towards fire safety, London’s building bye-laws and the capital’s fire protection. It subsequently weighs this evidence against other accounts of the fire as featured in newspapers and other contemporary texts. Our conclusions reveal significant variations between the coroner’s verdict and the media’s analysis of the fire, with particular focus given to accounts that sought to identify and hold to account those who were deemed publicly responsible for the failings to rescue the victims.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2021.1925414 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis |
Additional Information: | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in London Journal on 1st June 2021, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2021.1925414 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | fires, disasters, lessons, coroners, london, urban history, 1201 Architecture, 1604 Human Geography, 2103 Historical Studies, History, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Ewen, Shane |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jun 2021 11:16 |
Last Modified: | 13 Jul 2024 04:39 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives
| Preview