Abstract
The design and delivery of formal coach education and learning opportunities appear to be permeated by taken-for-granted discourses. These discourses exercise a systemised influence on the social construction of coaches’ professional knowledge, with potentially problematic consequences. Adopting a discursive methodology using discourse analysis, this study explored the ways in which facilitators and coaches in a high-performance coach education programme constructed coach learning. Data were collected over a two-year period using on-course participant observation (10 days), interviews with coaches and course facilitators (n = 29), and document analysis. Findings indicated a dominant discourse of ‘learning’ as a linear, mechanistic and unproblematic process occurring independently of context, and of coaches as experiential learners, which positioned participants as anti-intellectual and uncritical adopters of ‘what works’. These discourses functioned to reproduce relations of power between the facilitators (the holders of knowledge) and the participants (the recipients of knowledge). The impact of these discursive resources on programme design and delivery are discussed, alongside implications for elite coaches’ subjectivity and practice, in order to confront dominant and legitimate ‘truths’ in coach education.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1924143 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Routledge |
Additional Information: | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Sport, Education and Society on 9th May 2021, available online: http://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2021.1924143 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Sport Sciences, 1301 Education Systems, 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy, 1303 Specialist Studies in Education, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Clarke, Nicola |
Date Deposited: | 03 Jun 2021 10:49 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2024 20:49 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):