Abstract
Theresa May’s premiership is widely acknowledged to have been a failure, but political commentators and the scholarly literature have, thus far, tended to focus on May’s misuse of her agency. This article argues that May’s premiership presents a particularly powerful example of the need to disentangle structure and agency when assessing prime ministerial performance. Drawing upon the work of Stephen Skowronek, it sets out a framework of evaluating prime ministerial agency in ‘political time’. This is then used to show how the conditions and circumstances in which May governed limited the feasibility, increased the costs, and compromised the effectiveness of her actions in office. We argue that this confirms that May was a victim of circumstances as much as a victim of her own agency.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211016931 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1606 Political Science, Political Science & Public Administration, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Byrne, Christopher |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jun 2021 11:16 |
Last Modified: | 20 Jul 2024 16:17 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):