Abstract
Background
Engaging in regular physical activity requires continued complex decision-making in varied and dynamic individual, social and structural contexts. Widespread shortfalls of physical activity interventions suggests the complex underlying mechanisms of change are not yet fully understood. More insightful process evaluations are needed to design and implement more effective approaches. This paper describes the protocol for a process evaluation of the JU:MP programme, a whole systems approach to increasing physical activity in children and young people aged 5–14 years in North Bradford, UK.
Methods
This process evaluation, underpinned by realist philosophy, aims to understand the development and implementation of the JU:MP programme and the mechanisms by which JU:MP influences physical activity in children and young people. It also aims to explore behaviour change across wider policy, strategy and neighbourhood systems. A mixed method data collection approach will include semi-structured interview, observation, documentary analysis, surveys, and participatory evaluation methods including reflections and ripple effect mapping.
Discussion
This protocol offers an innovative approach on the use of process evaluation feeding into an iterative programme intended to generate evidence-based practice and deliver practice-based evidence. This paper advances knowledge regarding the development of process evaluations for evaluating systems interventions, and emphasises the importance of process evaluation.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12255-w |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | BMC |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Behaviour change, Children, Network mapping, Physical activity, Process evaluation, Qualitative, Realist, Ripple effect mapping, Systems thinking, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Public Health, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by McKenna, James |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jan 2022 15:20 |
Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2024 22:11 |
Item Type: | Article |
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):