Abstract
Background and Objectives: Uncertainty about the clinical efficacy of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) to alleviate pain spans half a century. There has been no attempt to synthesise the entire body of systematic review evidence. The aim of this comprehensive review was to critically appraise the characteristics and outcomes of systematic reviews evaluating the clinical efficacy of TENS for any type of acute and chronic pain in adults. Materials and Methods: We searched electronic databases for full reports of systematic reviews of studies, overviews of systematic reviews, and hybrid reviews that evaluated the efficacy of TENS for any type of clinical pain in adults. We screened reports against eligibility criteria and extracted data related to the characteristics and outcomes of the review, including effect size estimates. We conducted a descriptive analysis of extracted data. Results: We included 169 reviews consisting of eight overviews, seven hybrid reviews and 154 systematic reviews with 49 meta-analyses. A tally of authors' conclusions found a tendency toward benefits from TENS in 69/169 reviews, no benefits in 13/169 reviews, and inconclusive evidence in 87/169 reviews. Only three meta-analyses pooled sufficient data to have confidence in the effect size estimate (i.e., pooled analysis of >500 events). Lower pain intensity was found during TENS compared with control for chronic musculoskeletal pain and labour pain, and lower analgesic consumption was found post-surgery during TENS. The appraisal revealed repeated shortcomings in RCTs that have hindered confident judgements about efficacy, resulting in stagnation of evidence. Conclusions: Our appraisal reveals examples of meta-analyses with 'sufficient data' demonstrating benefit. There were no examples of meta-analyses with 'sufficient data' demonstrating no benefit. Therefore, we recommend that TENS should be considered as a treatment option. The considerable quantity of reviews with 'insufficient data' and meaningless findings have clouded the issue of efficacy. We offer solutions to these issues going forward.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57101060 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | MDPI |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | analgesia, efficacy, meta-analysis, neuromodulation, pain, pain management, systematic review, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS), Adult, Chronic Pain, Humans, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Pain Management, Pain Measurement, Systematic Reviews as Topic, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, General & Internal Medicine, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Blomfield, Helen |
Date Deposited: | 18 Mar 2022 13:29 |
Last Modified: | 18 Jul 2024 14:01 |
Item Type: | Article |
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):
- CA Paley ORCID: 0000-0002-6335-2666
- PG Wittkopf
- G Jones ORCID: 0000-0002-0313-0092
- MI Johnson ORCID: 0000-0002-9421-9622