Abstract
Street triage practitioners, consisting of mental health social workers and nurses, act as a conduit between service users and emergency services and have a significant amount of discretion in determining the care and treatment pathways for individuals experiencing mental health crises. However, this is set on a backdrop of neoliberal reforms which have resulted in an increased focus on risk management, accountability, responsibilisation, and managing scarce resources. Based on ethnographic research undertaken in a street triage setting in England, this paper examines the role of street triage practitioners as ‘street level bureaucrats’ and explores the impact of neoliberal mental health reforms on street level practice and how these shape and constrain the use of discretion in a street triage context. Revisiting the relevance of Lipsky through a neoliberal lens, the research paper identifies how street triage practitioners use their discretion to navigate practice dilemmas in a contemporary mental health landscape.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1332/QINL4154 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Bristol University Press |
Additional Information: | This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy edited version of an article published in the European Social Work Research journal. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1332/QINL4154 |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Hill, Darren |
Date Deposited: | 07 Feb 2023 09:42 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2024 16:36 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview