Abstract
In recent years, the discourses surrounding human rights and sport mega-events (SMEs) have grown immensely. These are often directed towards sport’s governing bodies responsible for the administration of these mega-events. Tapping into the growing scholarship, this article aims to advance the fields of sport, leisure and human rights. By reconsidering the commercial nature of sports’ governing bodies (focusing on IOC and FIFA), we argue that what is commonly referred to as the ‘Ruggie Principles’ both can and should be applied to FIFA and IOC’s practices and event-related operations. In this context, and by reflecting on the practical applications of human rights impact assessments in the context of sport governing bodies who are the awarding bodies of hosting rights, the paper argues that due diligence and human rights impact assessments should become an organisational mainstay of FIFA and IOC’s event-related operations. Whilst our normative argument can have implications for policy and practice, we also provide further directions for research in what remains a pivotal era of SMEs globally.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2022.2094998 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Additional Information: | © 2022 The Author(s) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1504 Commercial Services, 1506 Tourism, 1608 Sociology, Sport, Leisure & Tourism, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Campbell, Amy |
Date Deposited: | 08 Aug 2023 09:44 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2024 18:23 |
Item Type: | Article |