Abstract
This study explored academy football coaches’ perceptions and experiences of managing individual differences in the maturity timing of male adolescent football players in an English Premier League academy. Using a longitudinal mixed method design, 98 under 12–16 players were assessed for maturity status, growth velocities, and match performance grade. Interviews with nine respective coaches were conducted in parallel. The qualitative and quantitative data were combined to generate a contextualised richer understanding and four archetypal case studies. Findings showed coaches perceive various advantages and disadvantages to players maturing either ahead or in the delay of their peers and had different expectations of performance based upon a players maturity status; biological maturity status and timing had large implications for selection and release decisions. This study highlights the challenges of developing, managing and selecting adolescent players in elite male youth football. Biological maturation confounds talent identification and development, and academy environments need to monitor maturity status and educate coaches and selectors on the complexities and intricacies of individual differences in maturity timing.
More Information
Divisions: | Carnegie School of Sport |
---|---|
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541231186673 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Additional Information: | M. Hill, T. John, D. McGee, S.P. Cumming, Beyond the coaches eye: Understanding the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of maturity selection biases in male academy soccer, International journal of Sports Science & Coaching pp. 1-16. Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). DOI: 10.1177/17479541231186673 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Mann, Elizabeth |
Date Deposited: | 29 Aug 2023 15:40 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jul 2024 13:22 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):