Abstract
Universal design for learning (UDL) has been advocated for by adapted physical education scholars as a panacea to the challenges associated with teaching disabled and nondisabled students together in physical education. So much so that UDL currently occupies a privileged and largely unquestioned position in adapted physical education scholarship and practice, until now. To move scholarship forward, this article draws on published theoretical and empirical work relating to UDL generally and in physical education in particular to critically discuss the scientific research supporting, or not, the use of UDL as a so-called inclusive approach. We end this article with a call to action for scholars in this field, ourselves included, to conduct theoretically guided and empirically informed research relating to UDL in physical education, which adheres to established hallmarks of research quality that are tied to the ontological and epistemological assumptions of researchers because, at present, it is conspicuous by its absence.
More Information
Divisions: | Carnegie School of Education |
---|---|
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x231202658 |
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Sage Journals |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy, 1303 Specialist Studies in Education, Sport Sciences, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Mann, Elizabeth |
Date Deposited: | 20 Oct 2023 16:12 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jul 2024 07:17 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):