It is well known to primary teachers that effective assessment of children requires a multi-faceted approach (Sparks Linfield 1994). Equally, written feedback on a piece of work is often not understood by the pupils themselves (Sparks Linfield 1995). As one proceeds through secondary and tertiary education, this situation changes little, with the best attempts to set ‘perfect' assessments still leading to misinterpretation by students. It is also true that students often do not always recognise what is meant by the term ‘feedback' and have difficulty in interpreting and understanding the feedback that they receive, even with the most careful and targeted advice in advance. (Sutcliffe et al 2014) In 2010 the National Union of Students released a ‘Charter for Assessment and Feedback' which outlined ten principles for effective assessment and feedback. Despite this charter, the National Student Survey (NSS) in 2014 still showed twenty-eight percent of students were not satisfied. ‘Assessment and feedback was again rated the lowest by students, with just seventy-two percent saying they were satisfied with this, the same level as last year.' (Grove 2014) This poster considers research carried out in 2014 when the Year 2 cohort of students on a Bachelor of Arts Primary Education course were asked to complete a questionnaire inviting views on feedback on assessment they found most helpful in clarifying things they did not understand. Analysis of completed questionnaires revealed that although students' experiences of feedback and assessment within their first year of study had broadly matched the principles outlined within the NUS Charter, twenty-five percent of students still were not satisfied. Results from the cohort showed a desire for a range of types of feedback including a wish for face-to-face discussion to enable them to both assess their understanding of feedback comments and feed-forward actions. In addition, a common theme emerged: a lack of perception by students of their own roles and responsibilities within the assessment/feedback cycle. Recommendations are made for ways to overcome the challenge to provide assessment feedback that aims to give total satisfaction.
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)