Abstract
Purpose: the purpose of this article is to provide a dialectical framework for the examination of performance management in schools.
Design/methodology/approach: the article is based upon a qualitative study of 10 headteachers that involved in-depth semi-structured interviews.
Findings: the findings identified four dialectical tensions that underpin performance management in schools: the responsibility to teachers and the responsibility to pupils; external accountability and professional autonomy; discipline of teachers and support of teachers; fixed processes and improvisational practices.
Research implications: this article provides a means of examining the performance management of teachers from an alternative perspective, one that embraces tensions and contradictions and gives headteachers a richer understanding of how teachers are evaluated and judged.
Originality: this article moves beyond the traditional perspective of performance management in schools as a means of subjugation and control and offers an original dialectical framework within which to examine the phenomenon.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2014-0087 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Emerald |
Date Deposited: | 26 Jan 2016 15:49 |
Last Modified: | 10 Jul 2024 19:46 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview