Abstract
This systematic review quantifies methods used to measure the ‘retail food environment’ (RFE), appraises the quality of methodological reporting, and examines associations with obesity, accounting for differences in methods. Only spatial measures of the RFE, such as food outlet proximity were included. Across the 113 included studies, methods for measuring the RFE were extremely diverse, yet reporting of methods was poor (average reporting quality score: 58.6%). Null associations dominated across all measurement methods, comprising 76.0% of 1937 associations in total. Outcomes varied across measurement methods (e.g. narrow definitions of ‘supermarket’: 20.7% negative associations vs 1.7% positive; broad definitions of ‘supermarket’: 9.0% negative associations vs 10.4% positive). Researchers should report methods more clearly, and should articulate findings in the context of the measurement methods employed.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.02.007 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 1117 Public Health And Health Services, 1604 Human Geography, Public Health, |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Wilkins, Emma |
Date Deposited: | 28 Feb 2019 16:38 |
Last Modified: | 13 Jul 2024 20:14 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):