Abstract
Despite considerable research, evidence supporting associations between the ‘Retail Food Environment’ (RFE) and obesity remains mixed. Differences in the methods used to measure the RFE may explain this heterogeneity. Using data on a large (n = 10,111) sample of adults from the Yorkshire Health Study (UK), we modelled cross-sectional associations between the RFE and weight status using (i) multiple definitions of ‘Fast Food’, ‘Convenience’ and ‘Supermarkets’ and (ii) multiple RFE metrics, identified in a prior systematic review to be common in the literature. Both the choice of outlet definition and the choice of RFE metric substantively impacted observed associations with weight status. Findings differed in relation to statistical significance, effect sizes, and directions of association. This study provides novel evidence that the diversity of RFE measurement methods is contributing to heterogeneous study findings and conflicting policy messages. Greater attention is needed when selecting and communicating RFE measures in research.
More Information
Identification Number: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100404 |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Refereed: | Yes |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Depositing User (symplectic) | Deposited by Wilkins, Emma |
Date Deposited: | 26 Apr 2019 10:39 |
Last Modified: | 15 Jul 2024 22:47 |
Item Type: | Article |
Download
Note: this is the author's final manuscript and may differ from the published version which should be used for citation purposes.
License: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives
| Preview
Export Citation
Explore Further
Read more research from the author(s):